Chapter 5: Pricing Orders Responsibly

August 14, 2017

Fewer than half of Better Buying ratings show buyers are covering the costs of compliant production
    Cost and legal requirements.
    • We asked suppliers completing ratings: “What percent of the orders did the price paid by the buyer cover the costs of compliant production?”  The ratings for this category demonstrated large variability (0 to 5 stars), with the average rating being 4 stars.

While 41% of ratings indicated that all the orders received from buyers were priced to cover compliant production, nearly 20% indicated that fewer than half of their orders met this critical threshold. 

    • The findings from this pilot test cannot be generalized to the entire industry. The ratings submitted seemed to skew toward those of “better buyers.”

 As a result, the high rate of orders not priced to cover compliant production is troubling and legal regulations are such a widespread problem. 

    A supplemental question not used for scoring asks suppliers whether they have evidence that would support their response. While 28% indicate this could be demonstrated through a variety of materials, a full 72% of the ratings indicated they have no evidence. Suppliers not having carefully formulated and specific orders. While all of what Better Buying is measuring points to improvements buyers need to make in their purchasing practices, this is an area that suppliers can also work to improve.
    An optional question dug into pricing a bit more to understand the extent that the buyer engages in high pressure negotiation strategies. Of the 43 ratings that answered this question, 63% answered “yes.” Those high-pressure negotiation strategies included the following:
    • Asking suppliers to match a target price set by the buyer, or to match the prices the buyer received by other suppliers from different regions of the world.
    • Asking suppliers to show all cost breakdowns from one region and then using those details to insist on specific cost reductions in other regions.
    • Requiring suppliers to submit price bids or to turn around price quotations with little time to prepare.
    Positive findings related to cost and cost negotiation were captured in best practices suppliers reported when submitting their ratings, among them:
    • Allowing the supplier to use its own sources of raw material to lower the material cost and provide the best garment FOB cost.
    • Paying premium prices for small orders.
    • Carrying out a reasonable price negotiation with no pushing for small amounts.
    • Offering loans with subsidized interest rates for factory expansion.
    We expect some buyers to push back on the measure for cost and how those should be allocated. And of course, we expect suppliers to incorporate profit for themselves! Just as suppliers cannot be expected to meet elements of another suppliers’ cost model, Better Buying cannot dictate the “right” amount of overhead or profit suppliers should consider as they respond to this question.
    • Could some of the ratings be due to suppliers who are overzealous about the profits they think they should earn? Perhaps so.

But on the other hand it can allow them to keep workers on the job.

    Pricing orders responsibly is something buyers must improve and Better Buying will be able to track the improvements of specific buying companies over time.
How can you use the information Better Buying provides about cost and cost negotiation?
    • Buyers, even if you’ve not yet received detailed analysis of your own practices from Better Buying, the findings from our pilot test provide a lot for you to work with. Now would be a good time to begin thinking about how to support your suppliers so that they have enough time and multiple buyers.

To be clear though, we’re not suggesting you demand they open their books on specific orders, a practice that some say can pit suppliers against each other in unfair competitions.

    Suppliers, now is a good time to make sure you have developed a strategy to allocate costs of compliance across all your orders and vet new ones.
    We hope you are learning a lot about Better Buying through this report of findings from our pilot test.  Be sure to watch for next week’s report, which is on Design and Development.
    • Buyers, if your designers and developers aren’t signed up yet to receive our mailings, this is a good time to add them. Please

sign them up for our emails.

    • For more information about Better Buying,

please visit our website.

    Marsha A. Dickson, Ph.D. and Doug Cahn
    Co-Founders, Better Buying

Up Next

Chapter 6: Design and Development

Eighty percent or more of tech packs are delivered accurately and on time by buyers rated so far by Better Buying The design… Read More

Translate »